Advancing How The World Learns
We are UCLA CRESST, a national research center at the forefront of educational innovation. The groundbreaking work we do in assessment and evaluation has shaped the very fabric of our field. Our intellectual curiosity and passion for learning continue to drive it forward. This is where you will find methodologies and technologies that are solving today’s most pressing challenges and improving the quality of education across the globe.
CRESST was founded in 1966 within the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies. From the very beginning, we’ve known that the most effective solutions aren’t achieved at a distance. That’s why we conduct research where the work is—with real data from real problems. And the faith we place in our findings is hard earned. We create and study assessments, as well as conduct evaluations of formal and informal programs and technologies to confirm their efficacy. It’s a comprehensive approach that consistently yields valuable results. Read more…
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
We deliver actionable, meaningful research and development that advances the field of educational assessment and evaluation, promotes effective and equitable education policy, and improves evidence-based inferences.
CONSULTING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
CRESST is home to some of the most preeminent scholars and researchers in their respective fields. These skilled individuals collaborate with our clients, peeling back the layers to reveal effective global solutions to education and learning challenges.
Researchers at CRESST
Dr. Tobiason is a research scientist whose work draws on a decade of teaching experience across four countries. She has a background in formative assessment, standards-based instructional design, and teacher quality. Her current research focuses on the framing of teacher evaluation in popular media, as well as the technical, practical, and sociological aspects of measuring […]Read More Meet the Staff
Katerina Schenke is a Research Scientist at the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Her research is on understanding how and under what circumstances students are motivated towards learning, how we can measure motivation and engagement through digital games, and how we can develop models of assessment that are informative to […]Read More Meet the Staff
Li Cai is a Professor of Education and Psychology in the Advanced Quantitative Methodology program within the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies. He also serves as Director of the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). His research agenda involves the development, integration, and evaluation of innovative latent variable models that have wide-ranging applications in assessment research in educational, psychological, and health-related domains of study.Read More Meet the Staff
With a rich history steeped in education and an unwavering dedication to this day, we are uniquely positioned to guide policies and create the kinds of tools that improve the quality of learning.More Info
We partner with the U.S. military
to model and implement assessment and training systems that produce hard-to-measure information—such as cognitively complex performance data, decision-making abilities, and situation awareness.
Through interdisciplinary research, we evaluate medical simulations and assess both individual and team skills, shining a light on opportunities to elevate the level of performance and care.More Info
Center on Standards and Assessment Implementation (CSAI)
CRESST is a partner in CSAI (Center on Standards and Assessment Implementation), where we help build and increase state capacity to assist districts and schools in meeting student achievement goals.
We bring our expertise to CSAI in curriculum, instruction, and standards with a focus on formative assessment to support classroom teachers in implementing new standards. These formative assessment practices promote students’ deeper learning of content and achievement. Additionally, we create resources and leverage existing resources from a range of federal networks to provide the most up-to-date information about states’ standards, assessment, and accountability systems.
Our work with CSAI improves state policies, practices, and support to districts for the implementation of rigorous college and career readiness standards and assessments. It also increases the capacity of the regional Comprehensive Centers to meet the technical assistance and implementation needs of states around standards, assessment, and accountability. And we are supporting the long-term sustainability of educational reform efforts across states and districts.
Shiphandling Skills Automated Assessment
In collaboration with the Surface Warfare Officers School (SWOS), in Newport, Rhode Island, CRESST is developing an automated assessment engine (AAE) capable of evaluating shiphandling skills as part of a larger Navy training initiative known as NSTAT (Navigation and Shiphandling Training and Assessment Tools).
Despite its critical importance to the Navy, shiphandling training is becoming increasingly more challenging as Surface Warfare Officers are spending less time at sea, and consequently experiencing fewer opportunities to conn a ship under the apprenticeship of a more experienced Master Mariner. This can lead to less confidence and diminished competence in shiphandling among Surface Warfare Officers, which in turn increases the Navy’s risk for accidents (collisions, allisions, groundings, etc.) when carrying out mission-critical tasks.
To address these concerns, the Navy has invested in the Conning Officers Virtual Environment (COVE) and the associated intelligent tutoring system that can be paired with it, COVE-ITS. Together, these synthetic training systems provide opportunities for students to practice shiphandling tasks with spoken coaching and feedback, based on their actions. However, in its current form, the COVE-ITS is incapable of providing deeper, more aggregated assessments of student performance, such as those that could (1) identify skill areas that require remediation; and (2) identify root causes for misconceptions or gaps in knowledge as they contribute to diminished skills.
The CRESST automated assessment engine serves to complement and enhance the spoken coaching and feedback capabilities of the COVE-ITS. This software module is designed to make inferences of student shiphandling skills based on real-time, observed performance of students working within the COVE. The development of the AAE is being done in collaboration with the developers of the COVE-ITS, Dr. Stanley Peters and his team at Stanford University. Overall, the AAE will enable instructors and students to identify strengths and weaknesses within the shiphandling domain more accurately and efficiently, and guide remediation (when necessary) to focus on root cause misconceptions and/or gaps in knowledge. The AAE addresses the shiphandling topics of (1) Mooring at a pier (docking); (2) Getting underway from a pier; (3) Underway Replenishment (UNREP); and (4) Harbor Transit.
Anesthesiology Skills Automated Assessment
CRESST will work with a team from the UCLA Medical School and individuals from the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Information Studies to develop and research a medical simulation to assess teamwork skills. The simulation will be accessible online (via secure server) or offline, permit repetitive practice, be engaging (game-like), and provide feedback in the form of summative assessment after each scenario module. The skills to be addressed within the simulation are relevant to general aspects of healthcare and specifically to military healthcare, where deployments often disrupt designated teams and heighten the need to form cohesive units quickly. Individual practice in synthetic training environments such as this one can supplement face-to-face team training.
Our project objective is to research learning and performance differences between two primary modes to simulate team training: (1) an Evaluator Mode in which students interact with the simulation system by providing annotations on observed team interactions without affecting the outcome of the event; and (2) a Game-Play Mode in which students play the role of a team member (leader or follower) and contribute to the outcome of the simulated scenario. Both groups will receive identical instruction on one or more specific team training skills prior to each scenario, and both will receive summative feedback and scoring after each scenario. A primary outcome of this research is focused on the training effectiveness differences between the two modes (evaluator vs. game-play). The reason for this comparison of training modes is to examine the development of synthetic team training from a cost-benefit perspective. This includes examining the development effort vs. learning and performance expectations. Our contentions are (1) that optimal team training relies on immersive participation which our game-play mode will emulate; and (2) that for team training, development of an evaluator-style simulation is less costly (regarding development time, programming expertise needed, resources required, etc.) compared to a game-play style simulator.